SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Yogendra Pal vs State & Anr on 18 September, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2524 / 2017
Yogendra Pal S/o Shri Brij Lal, By Caste Kumhar, Resident of Ward
No.2, Vijaynagar, Tehsil Vijaynagar, District Sriganganagar.

—-Petitioner
Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan

2. Neha Verma W/o Mahendra Pal D/o Vijay Kumar, Aged About 25
Years, Fusewala, Tehsil Srikaranpur, District Sriganganagar.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. DS Thind.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. VS Rajpurohit PP for the State.

Mr. VK Bhadu.

__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
18/09/2017

1. The petitioner has preferred this misc. petition under

Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.26/2017, lodged at

Police Station Kesrisighpur, District Sri Ganganagar, for the offence

under Sections 406, 498A, 420, 379, 323, 294, 376, 377, 313,

311, 511, 120B of IPC.

2. The complaint was lodged against the entire family for

the matrimonial offence including under Sections 406, 498A, 420,

379, 323, 294, 376, 377, 313, 311, 511, 120B of IPC.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that

apparently, it is a case of over implication and the FIR does not

induce confidence on the face of it.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2524/2017]

the petitioners want to submit a representation alongwith all the

relevant documents before the concerned investigating authority.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that if the

petitioner submit a representation along with all the necessary

documents before the concerned investigating authority within a

period of 30 days from today, then the same shall be considered

and decided strictly in accordance with law, before completing the

investigation.

4. In light of the aforesaid assurance given by learned

Public Prosecutor, the present misc. petition is disposed of with a

direction to the concerned investigating authority that in case the

petitioner submit a representation along with all the necessary

documents before it within a period of 30 days from today, then

the same shall be considered and decided before completing the

investigation, strictly in accordance with law and as per the

assurance given by the learned Public Prosecutor. However, if

during the investigation, the concerned investigating authority

needs to arrest the petitioner, then the petitioner shall be given 15

days notice before making such arrest. The petitioner shall be at

liberty to approach this Court again, in case need arises.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

ck

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation