Pawan Prakash & Ors vs State & Anr on 21 July, 2017

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2291 / 2017

1. Pawan Prakash S/o Ganga Ram

2. Ganga Ram S/o Mangi Lal

3. Smt. Kamla Devi W/o Ganga Ram

4. Anand Kumar Sharma S/o Ganga Ram

5. Sapna W/o Anand Kumar Sharma,
All by Caste Suthar, Resident of Royalty Naka, Near Panna Lal
Gaushala, Mandore, Jodhpur.

—-Petitioners
Versus

1. The State of Rajasthan

2. Smt. Lalita W/o Pawan Prakash Sharma D/o Satish Chandra
Jangid, By Caste Jangid, Resident of Laxmi Nagar, Barmer.

—-Respondents
__
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Acharya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. MS Panwar, PP
Mr. RC Khichi, for the complainant
__
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
Order
21/07/2017

1. Petitioners have preferred this misc. petition under

Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.20/2017 dated

18.02.2017 police Station Mahila, Barmer,, for the offences under

Sections 498A, 406, 323 IPC.

2. Counsel for the both the parties are present and both

parties jointly submitted that a compromise has happened

between the parties essentially the matter is a matrimonial
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-2291/2017]

matter.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor assures this Court that a

compromise if submitted shall be taken on record by the

investigating authority and the investigation shall be completed

after taking the compromise on record strictly in accordance with

law.

4. On such assurance given by learned Public Prosecutor,

this misc. petition is disposed of with the direction to investigating

officer to take the compromise on record and complete the

investigation strictly in accordance with law. If the investigating

officer needs to arrest the present petitioners then a notice of

prior 15 days shall be given before arrest. In case need arises the

petitioners shall be at liberty to approach this Court again.

(DR. PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI)J.

sudheer

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *