Welcome › Forums › Advice › 498A › Petition to Rajya Sabha for Section 498A IPC › Reply To: Petition to Rajya Sabha for Section 498A IPC
24. FIR of 498A, Should not be reason for Divorce/Maintenance or Custody
is not correct. It will be big harrassment for husband as he will be forced live
with his tormentor. FIR should be reason enough for divorce. And if the reason
for FIR is frivolous divorce should be without maintenance.
Also we need to add that
judgement (even for Anticipatory bail) should contain the list of evidences
submitted by both the parties to support their claims. Many times judges simply
ignore the profound evidences submitted by the husband and base the
order/judgement on vague statements/evidences submitted by the so called wife
side.
In my case s/he actually accepted before judge in front of everybody that s/he
had not undergone a (crucial) medical test recommended by lady gynaecologist. It
was shocking in addition to so many other instances. Medical report consisting
of two lines didnot even had panel doctors signature. Till date we do not have
individual medical test details.
Even during the medical examination few doctors who were known to (transgender)
wife’s side shouted on gynaecologist and warned her dire consequences.