MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

DP3 FIR format and explanation

DP means Dowry Prohibition Act. Under Sec 3&4 of the Act, Giving dowry as well as accepting dowry is illegal and the same is punishable. Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 sec 3. Penalty for giving or taking dowry. -(1) If any person, after the commencement of…

Guj HC: Another 498A Quash against In-laws on Vague & general Allegations

Gujarat High Court 4 Whether This Case Involves A … vs State Of Gujarat & on 17 November, 2017 R/CR.MA/2705/2015 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 2705 of 2015 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE:…

Guj. HC: 498A/DP/Adultery FIR Quash against Husband & Entire Family Members

Gujarat High Court Prataprai Chhaganlal Joshi & 5 vs State Of Gujarat & on 6 September, 2017 R/CR.MA/17092/2015 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 17092 of 2015 [On note for speaking to minutes…

Gift after marriage is not dowry

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD, LUCKNOW BENCH A.F.R RESERVED Court No. – 13 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. – 421 of 1992 Appellant :- Rama Shanker & Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Appellant :- Brijesh Verma,R P Mishra,Rahul Shukla Counsel for…

Family laws are being misused

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI LPA 736/2013 & CM 15769/2013 Date of decision : May 26, 2014 MS. NIDHI KAUSHIK ….. Appellant Through : Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sachin Chauhan, Ms. Saahila Lamba, Mr. Sameer Sharma, Advs. versus…

IPC 498A/323/504/506/DP 3&4 Quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION No. 584/2007 (Under Section 482 of the CrPC) Dhiri Singh & 3 Others …….Applicants Versus State of Uttarakhand & Another ……Respondents Mr. S.K. Mandal, Advocate, for the applicants. Mr. P.S. Bohara, Brief Holder, for…

Quash of compoundable offence Section 498A IPC

Bombay High Court State Of Maharashtra vs Madhu Bhisham Bhatia And Ors. on 16 February, 2004 JUDGMENT P.B. Gaikwad, J. 1. State has filed appeal challenging the order passed by Metropolitan Magistrate 31st Court, Vikroli, Bombay dated 13th November, 1992 acquitting the accused for the…

498A Quash – No Offence out of FIR

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr. Misc. No. 24423 of 2004: (1) Dinesh Kumar Lal, son of Mohin Chander Lal, (2) Gayatri @ Nilu, wife of Dinesh Kumar Lal, both of village Kashipur, Near Dr. B.N. Prasad, PS Town, District Samastipur Petitioners. with…

Repeated 498A FIR quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Cr.Misc. No.18717 of 2009 1. AJAY KUMAR, SON OF SHRI RAM CHANDRA LAL 2. RAM CHANDRA LAL, SON OF SHATRUGHAN LAL 3. VEENA DEVI, WIFE OF SHRI RAM CHANDRA LAL ALL RESIDENT OF MEHSAUL, WARD NO. 19,…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh