SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sulochna Kallappa Bandiwadar And … vs The State Of Maharashtra on 10 June, 2019

1/327-ABA-706-19withAPPP566-19.odt

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJUDICATUREATBOMBAY
CRIMINALAPPELLATEJURISDICTION

ANTICIPATORYBAILAPPLICATIONNO.706OF2019

SulochanaKallappaBandiwadarAnr…..Applicants
versus
TheStateofMaharashtra….Respondent
WITH
CRIMINALAPPLICATIONNO.566OF2019
IN
ANTICIPATORYBAILAPPLICATIONNO.706OF2019
AnandShankarShinde….Applicant/Intervener
Inthematterbetween3.00p.m
SulochanaKallappaBandiwadarAnr…..Applicants
versus
TheStateofMaharashtra….Respondent
…….

•Mr.VikrantV.Phatate,AdvocateforApplicant.
•Mr.RamdasH.PatilforIntervener.
•Mr.PrashantJadhav,APPforstate.

CORAM:SARANGV.KOTWAL,J.
DATE:10thJUNE,2019

P.C.:

1.TheApplicantsareseekinganticipatorybailin

connectionwithC.R.No.I09of2019registeredwithMandrup

PoliceStation,undersections498Ar/w.34SectionoftheIndianPenal

Code.

V.B.GOKHALE

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:31:::
2/327-ABA-706-19withAPPP566-19.odt

2.TheF.I.R.islodgedon12/01/2019basedonthe

statementgivenbythedeceasedKarishmaBandiwadkar.The

statementwasrecordedasdyingdeclaration.Thedeceased

succumbedtoherinjurieson17/01/2019.Thedyingdeclaration

wasrecordedbyPSI,MandrupPolicestation.Shehasstatedthat

shegotmarriedninemonthspriortotheincident.Shewas

continuouslyharassedbypresentapplicants.Theapplicantsare

motherinlawandsisterinlawofthedeceased.Becauseoftheir

harassmentshehadcommittedsuicide.

3.TheallegationsintheF.I.R.arevague.Theallegations

donotpointoutthattheharassmentwasofsuchanaturewhich

wouldattractdefinitionofcrueltyU/s.498AofSectionI.P.C.orabettment

asdefinedinS.107ofSectionI.P.C.forthepurposeofattractingS.306of

SectionI.P.C.Moreover,dyingdeclarationisrecordedinthepresenceof

Karishma’sfather.Consideringalltheseaforementionedfacts,at

thisstage,itisdifficulttoobservethatpresentapplicantshad

abettedcommissionofsuicidebythedeceased.Therefore,inmy

view,theapplicantshavemadeoutacaseforgrantofanticipatory

bail.Thecustodialinterrogationoftheapplicantsisnotnecessary.

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:31:::
3/327-ABA-706-19withAPPP566-19.odt

4.Hence,thefollowingorder:

ORDER

(i)Intheeventoftheirarrestinconnectionwith
C.R.No.I09of2019registeredwithMandrup
PoliceStation,Dist.Solapur,theapplicantsare
directedtobereleasedonbailontheir
furnishingPRbondsinthesumofRs.25,000/-
each(RupeesTwentyFiveThousandOnlyeach)
withoneortwosuretieseachinthelikeamount.

(ii)Applicationstandsdisposedofaccordingly.

(iii)Connectedapplicationforinterventionisalso
disposedof.

(SARANGV.KOTWAL,J.)

:::Uploadedon-10/06/201911/06/201903:42:31:::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation