SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Chandra Mani Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 24 August, 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24222 of 2014
Arising Out of P.S.Case No. -2012 Year- 2013 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- BANKA

Chandra Mani Kumar son of Krishnandan Prasad, Resident of Village- Majitpur,
P.S.- Manpur, District- Nalanda

…. …. Petitioners
Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Seema Devi w/o Chandra Mani Kumar, daughter of Pramod Mandal, Resident
of Village- Pathra, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka

…. …. Opposite Parties

Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the Opposite Party No.2 : Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date: 24-08-2017

This application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has been filed to

quash the order dated 21.01.2014 passed by SDJM, Banka in Complaint Case

No.2012/2013/Trial No.1448 of 2014 whereunder the court below finding prima-

facie case for the offence under Sections 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the

Dowry Prohibition Act ordered for issuance of summons against the petitioner.

2. Heard and perused the record.

3. Petitioner is husband of Opposite Party No.2. His marriage was

performed on 24.05.2013. The petitioner’s bail was allowed on account of

compromise between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

both the parties have compromised the case and they are residing together at Pune

where the petitioner is in service. In such circumstance, the learned counsel for

the petitioner does not want to press the petition on merit.

4. The learned APP submitted that the lower court may be directed to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24222 of 2014 dt.24-08-2017

2/2

get the case disposed of at the earliest in the light of restoration of good relation

between the spouses.

5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, this criminal

miscellaneous application is dismissed as not pressed.

6. However, it is observed that the court below in view of submission

of both the parties, shall dispose of the case at the earliest.

(Sanjay Kumar, J)

B.Kr./-

AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date 29.08.2017

Transmission 29.08.2017
Date

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Not found ...?HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine


All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

FREE LEGAL ADVICE
LOGINREGISTERFORGOT PASSWORDCHANGE PASSWORDGROUP RULES
Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation