SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Geeta And Anr vs State Of Haryana on 13 September, 2017


Criminal Misc. No.M- 15279 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : September 13, 2017

Geeta and another …..Petitioners


State of Haryana ….Respondent

Criminal Misc. No.M- 15592 of 2017 (OM)

Jagwanti …..Petitioner


State of Haryana ….Respondent


Present: Mr. Sandeep Kotla, Advocate
for the petitioner. (in CRM-M-15279-2017)

Mr. K.S. Dhaliwal, Advocate
for the petitioner. (in CRM-M-15592-2017)

Mr. Sanjay K. Saini, AAG, Haryana.


This order shall dispose of two petitions i.e. Criminal Misc.

Nos. M- 15279 and 15592 of 2017. The facts of the case are extracted from

CRM-M-15279-2017 for the sake of convenience.

The petitioners in both the above said petitions pray for grant of

anticipatory bail in FIR No. 347 dated 18.07.2017 under Sections 323, 506,

148, 149, 342, 354B IPC registered at Police Station Sector 10, Gurgaon.

It is submitted that the petitioner – Geeta was not named in the

FIR. She was not even present at the spot at the time of alleged incident.

Moreover, all the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. There

Criminal Misc. No.M- 15279 of 2017 (OM) -2-

1 of 2
18-09-2017 01:11:14 :::
is no evidence against the petitioners to attract the rigours of Section 354

IPC in the present case. All the petitioners have joined investigation

pursuant to interim order dated 03.05.2017 (in CRM-M-15279-2017) and

order dated 04.05.2017 (in CRM-M-15592-2017). It is, thus, prayed that

these petitions be allowed.

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Ranbir,

verifies that the petitioners have joined investigation.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that the

petitioners are likely to abscond or that they are likely to dissuade the

witnesses from deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted above but

without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is considered just

and expedient to allow these petitions. Consequently, order dated

03.05.2017 (in CRM-M-15279-2017) and order dated 04.05.2017 (in CRM-

M-15592-2017) are made absolute.

(Lisa Gill)
September 13, 2017 Judge

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No

Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
18-09-2017 01:11:15 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.

Recent Comments


Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation