SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Parmod Jain vs State Of Haryana on 25 September, 2017


Criminal Misc. No. M- 32723 of 2017 (OM)
Date of decision : September 25, 2017

Parmod Jain …..Petitioner


State of Haryana ….Respondent


Present: Mr. Navneet Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Sanjay K. Saini, AAG, Haryana.


The petitioner, who is the father-in-law of the complainant,

prays for bail pending trial in FIR No. 299 dated 25.05.2016 under

Sections 419, 420, 498A, 406, 120B IPC registered at Police Station Sohna,

District Gurgaon.

It is submitted that the petitioner’s first application for bail

pending trial was withdrawn on 25.05.2017 as the petitioner sought to

approach the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurgaon for the relief after

presentation of the final report/challan in this case. It is submitted that there

are general allegations against the petitioner, which are not substantiated by

the evidence on record. Moreover, the petitioner has lost his son i.e. the

complainant’s husband on 04.07.2017. The petitioner has been in custody

since 06.04.2017. Final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C./challan has been

presented. It is, thus, prayed that this petition be allowed.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties.

1 of 2
27-09-2017 06:44:55 :::
Criminal Misc. No. M- 32723 of 2017 (OM) -2-

Learned counsel for the State, on instructions from ASI Surjeet

Singh, verifies that final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C./challan has since

been presented. It is further verified that the petitioner’s son has passed

away on 04.07.2017. No recovery is to be effected from the petitioner, who

is not reported to be involved in any other criminal case.

There are no allegations on behalf of the State that petitioner is

likely to abscond or that he is likely to dissuade the witnesses from

deposing true facts in the Court, if released on bail. Trial in this case is not

likely to conclude in the near future.

No useful purpose shall be served by keeping the petitioner

incarcerated any longer. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances noted

above but without expressing any opinion on the merits of case, it is

considered just and expedient to allow this petition.

Consequently, the petitioner be released on bail pending trial

subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds and surety to the satisfaction of

the learned trial Court.

It is reiterated that none of the observations made herein above

are a reflection on the merits of the case and shall have no bearing on the


(Lisa Gill)
September 25, 2017 Judge
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No

2 of 2
27-09-2017 06:44:55 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation