—
Bombay High Court
Ramkrushna Balasaheb Arane And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra And Another on 26 February, 2024
Author: Mangesh S. Patil
Bench: Mangesh S. Patil
2024:BHC-AUG:4115-DB
1 12.Cri.Appln.532-2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 532 OF 2024
IN APPLN/7076/2017
RAMKRUSHNA BALASAHEB ARANE AND OTHERS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
…
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. S.R. Varma h/f Mr.Paranjape Prakash S
Addl.PP for Respondent/State : Mr. M.M. Nerlikar
…
CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL
SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.
DATE : 26 FEBRUARY 2024
PER COURT :
. This is the sheer abuse of process of law.
2. The original application filed under Section 482 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, seeking quashment of the crime, was dismissed in
default by the order dated 03.02.2021. In order to seek its restoration,
Criminal Application No.1679/2021 was filed. By the order dated
09.12.2021 even that was dismissed in default. By way of this
application, another attempt has been made to seek restoration of the
original application.
3. Pertinently, as is being submitted by the learned Advocate for the
applicant, pursuant to the order dated 06.02.2018 passed in the main
2 12.Cri.Appln.532-2024.doc
application seeking quashment, interim relief was granted and the trial
has been stayed. It is pertinent to note that it is a regular criminal case
of the year 2017 for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323,
504, 506 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. After having enjoyed
the benefit of the interlocutory order, the matter has been protracted.
4. The application is rejected with cost of Rs.5000/- to be deposited
within two weeks.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J.]
Najeeb