SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sukhjinderpal Singh @ Sukha And … vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 3 July, 2018

In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh

CRM No.M-48110 of 2017
Date of Decision:- 3.7.2018

Sukhjinderpal Singh @ Sukha and others … Petitioners


State of Punjab and another … Respondents


Present:- Mr. Inder Pal Singh, Advocate
for the petitioners.

Ms. Ruchika Sabharwal, AAG, Punjab.

Mr. M.K.Dhot, Advocate
for Mr. S.K.Daaria, Advocate
for the complainant/respondent no.2.



The petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.112 dated 20.9.2014,

under Sections 498A/406 IPC registered at Police Station Sarai Amanat

Khan, District Amritsar, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-2) having

been effected amongst the parties.

Vide order dated 21.2.2018, the parties were directed to appear

before the Illaqa Magistrate to get their statements recorded in respect of

alleged compromise. Report of JMIC, Tarn Taran has been received

wherein it has been reported that the statements of the complainant Jatinder

Kaur, accused – Sukhjinderpal Singh, Gurpreet Kaur and Daljit Kaur have

been recorded. Even the statement of S.I. Baljinder Singh, SHO had been

recorded. The complainant Jatinder Kaur stated that the matter stands

resolved and that she is presently residing with the accused Sukhjinderpal

1 of 2
08-07-2018 08:42:24 :::
(2) CRM No.M-48110 of 2017

Singh in her matrimonial home. She has further stated that the compromise

is genuine and is without any pressure or coercion or any undue influence

and that she has no objection, if the FIR is quashed. The JMIC, Tarn Taran

in her report has also opined that the compromise appears to be genuine.

In view of the aforesaid position, especially, the fact that the

complainant has started residing with her husband, I am satisfied that the

matter has been amicably resolved. Accordingly the petition is accepted

and the FIR and all consequent proceedings are hereby quashed.

3.7.2018 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill)
kamal Judge

Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No

Whether Reportable Yes / No

2 of 2
08-07-2018 08:42:24 :::

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2021 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation