SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Judgments of Supreme Court of India and High Courts

Sk Atarul @ Atarul Sk vs Unknown on 20 September, 2017


S/L 8.

September 20, 2017. C.R.M. No. 8660 of 2017

In re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on
August 29, 2017 in connection with Panrui Police Station Case No. 21 of 2017 dated
March 7, 2017 under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections
3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.


In the matter of: Sk Atarul @ Atarul Sk


Mr. Sabir Ahmed,
Mr. Hillo Podder,
Mr. Lotful Haque,
Mr. Habibur Rahaman,
Mr. Golam Karim Chowdhury

…for the petitioner.

Mr. Siladitya Banerjee

…for the State.

Heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the respective parties.

The petitioner is seeking bail in connection with a case relating to offences
punishable under Sections 498A/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sections 3/4 of
the Dowry Prohibition Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband of the
victim and he is in no way connected with the case and he has been falsely implicated in the
instant case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is in
custody for sixty-one days and the investigation has been completed and the charge-sheet
has been submitted and there is no need of further detention of the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Having considered the submissions made on behalf of the parties and also considering the entire
facts and circumstances of the case and the materials in the case diary and that the investigation has been

completed and the charge-sheet has been submitted, we are of the opinion that further detention of the
accused/petitioner is not required.

Accordingly, the accused/petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs
.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, one of whom must be local, having sufficient
immovable property, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Suri,
Birbhum, on conditions that after being released on bail, the accused/petitioner shall not
tamper with the evidence and make any inducement or threat to any person acquainted with
the facts of the case and he shall attend the court below on each and every occasion unless
prevented by sufficient cause, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to
cancel the bail of the petitioner without any further reference to this Court.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of.

(Rajiv Sharma, J.)

(Md. Mumtaz Khan, J.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link
MyNation Times Magzine

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Landmark SC/HC Judgements
Rules and Regulations of India.


Copyright © 2024 SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation