Laws and Bare Acts of India at MyNation.net

MyNation Foundation Online Law Library

Section 135 – Customs Act, 1962

The Customs Act, 1962

 

 

135. EVASION OF DUTY OR PROHIBITIONS. –

 

1(1) Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person –

 

(a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon or of any prohibition for the time being imposed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force with respect to such goods, or

 

(b) acquires possession of or is in any way concerned in carrying, removing, depositing, harboring, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing or in any other manner dealing with any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under section 111, he shall be punishable, – (i) in the case of an offence relating to any of the goods to which section 123 applies and the market price whereof exceeds one lakh of rupees, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and with fine :

 

Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court, such imprisonment shall not be for less than three years;

 

(ii) in any other case, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.

 

2(2) If any person convicted of an offence under this section or under sub-section (1) of section 136 is again convicted of an offence under this section, then, he shall be punishable for the second and for every subsequent offence with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and with fine :

 

Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court such imprisonment shall not be for less than 3one year.

 

(3) For the purposes of sub-sections (1) and (2), the following shall not be considered as special and adequate reasons for awarding a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than one year, namely :- (i) the fact that the accused has been convicted for the first time for an offence under this Act;

 

(ii) the fact that in any proceeding under this Act, other than a prosecution, the accused has been ordered to pay a penalty or the goods which are the subject matter of such proceedings have been ordered to be confiscated or any other action has been taken against him for the same act which constitutes the offence;

 

(iii) the fact that the accused was not the principal offender and was acting merely as a carrier of goods or otherwise was a secondary party to the commission of the offence;

 

(iv) the age of the accused.

 

Comments

Where the case has been established that the wrist watches having foreign marks were the smuggled goods; the conviction was justified; Union of India v. Shyamsunder, AIR 1994 SC 485.

 

—————

1.  Subs. by Act 22 of 2007, for sub-section (1). Earlier section 135 was renumbered as sub-section thereof by Act 36 of 1973, sec. 5 (w.e.f. 1-9-1973) and was amended by Act 25 of 1978, sec. 16 (w.e.f. 1-7-1978) by Act 40 of 1989, sec. 3 (w.e.f. 26-10-1989) and by Act 32 of 2003, sec. 124 (w.e.f. 14-5-2003). Sub-section (1), before substitution by Act 22 of 2007, stood as under:

 

“(1) Without prejudice to any action that may be taken under this Act, if any person—

 

(a) is in relation to any goods in any way knowingly concerned in misdeclaration of value or in any fraudulent evasion or attempt at evasion of any duty chargeable thereon or of any prohibition for the time being imposed under this Act or any other law for the time being in force with respect to such goods, or

 

(b)  acquires possession of or is in any way concerned in carrying, removing, depositing, harbouring, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing or in any other manner dealing with any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under section 111 or section 113, as the case may be, or,

 

(c)  attempts to export any goods which he knows or has reason to believe are liable to confiscation under section 113, shall be punishable,—

 

(i) in the case of an offence relating to any of the goods to which section 123 applies and the market price whereof exceeds one lakh of rupees, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and with fine:

 

Provided that in the absence of special and adequate reasons to the contrary to be recorded in the judgment of the court, such imprisonment shall not be for less than three years;

 

(ii) in any other case with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.”.

 

2.  Ins. by Act 36 of 1973, sec. 5 (w.e.f. 1-9-1973).

 

3.  Subs. by Act 25 of 1978, sec. 16, for “six months” (w.e.f. 1-7-1978).

 

Previous | Next

 

Laws – Customs Act, 1962

 

Indian Laws – Bare Acts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2024 Laws and Bare Acts of India at MyNation.net
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Section 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

MyNation FoundationMyNation FoundationMyNation Foundation