MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Gujrat HC : No Multiple maintenance

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2080 of 2010 HEMLATABEN MAHESHBHAI CHAUHAN – Applicant(s) Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 – Respondent(s) Appearance : MR HEMANT B RAVAL for Applicant(s) : 1, MR KARTIK PANDYA ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for…

DV can be filed anywhere

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL. M.C. No. 1784/2009 Judgment delivered on: 12.10.2009 Manish Tandon & Ors. …… Petitioners Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate versus State & Anr. ….. Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for State. Mr. Ayush Gupta, Advocate…

Magistrate should not blindly call all family members as respondents

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28/10/2010 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.RAJASURIA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.10280 of 2010 and M.P.(MD) Nos.1 and 2 of 2010 1.Vijaya Baskar 2.Mariappan 3.Sorna 4.Vijayakumar 5.Balamurugan 6.Mohana … Petitioners Vs. Suganya Devi … Respondent Prayer Petition filed under Section…

498A quashed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 137 of 2010 Ram Nandan Jha. Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Bibhuti Bhushan Jha. Opp. Parties CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K.SINHA For the Petitioner: Mr. B.M.Tripathy, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Navin…

Under Section 313 Cr.P.C, accuser Presence not required

Supreme Court of India BASAVARAJ R. PATIL & ORS versus STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS S.N.Variava, K.T.Thomas J U D G M E N T THOMAS, J. Leave granted. When a criminal court completes prosecution evidence (other than in summons cases) is it indispensably mandatory…

Accuser Presence is not required under 313 CrPC

Kerala High Court Bench: A Basheer Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 26/4/2005 ORDER A.K. Basheer, J. 1. Is it mandatory that the accused should be invariably present in Court to answer the questions put to him under Section 313 of the Code of Criminal…

Quashing of Section 498A IPC FIR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 6th July, 2010 Date of Order: July 15, 2010 Crl. M.C. No. 370/2010 CHAND RAM & ORS. … Petitioner Through: Nemo. Versus STATE & ANR … Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Choudhary & Mr….

DVA only against who are in domestic relationship

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: September 20, 2010 Date of Order: 4th October, 2010 Crl.M.C.No. 4246/2009 Razia Begum … Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay M. Lal, Advocate Versus State, NCT of Delhi & Ors. … Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil…

How to decide domestic relationship in DVA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: 2010 Date of Order: 20th September, 2010 CRL.M.C. 4159/2009, Crl. M.A. No. 14141/2009 ADIL & ORS. ….. Petitioner Through: Mr. N.K. Handa, Adv. Versus STATE & ANR. ….. Respondent Through Ms Rakhi Dubey,…

Frivolous petition claiming damages dismissed

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: February 08, 2010 Date of Order: March 04, 2010 CM(M) 188/2010 04.03.2010 Smt. Saritha Rao & Ors. …Petitioners Through: Mr. L.K. Garg, Advocate vs. Y. Raghunath Rao & Anr. …Respondents Through: nemo JUSTICE…


Not found ...? HOW TO WIN 498a, DV, DIVORCE; Search in Above link

All Law documents and Judgment copies
Laws and Bare Acts of India
Important SC/HC Judgements on 498A IPC
Rules and Regulations of India.

STUDY REPORTS

Copyright © 2019 MyNation KnowledgeBase
eXTReMe Tracker
×

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away

MyNation HELP line

We are Not Lawyers, but No Lawyer will give you Advice like We do

Please read Group Rules – CLICK HERE, If You agree then Please Register CLICK HERE and after registration  JOIN WELCOME GROUP HERE

We handle Women Centric biased laws like False Sectioin 498A IPC, Domestic Violence(DV ACT), Divorce, Maintenance, Alimony, Child Custody, HMA 24, 125 CrPc, 307, 312, 313, 323, 354, 376, 377, 406, 420, 497, 506, 509; TEP, RTI and many more…

Web Design BangladeshWeb Design BangladeshMymensingh