1872 – MyNation KnowledgeBase

Every death of a Women is not abetment

Posted on 29/05/202129/05/2021 by MyNation 2 Comments

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos. 1735-1736 OF 2010 SATBIR SINGH & ANOTHER …APPELLANTS Versus STATE OF HARYANA …RESPONDENT JUDGMENT N. V. RAMANA, CJI. 1. The present appeals arise out of the impugned judgment dated 06.11.2008 passed by the…

Signature on document to be attested to prove the Document

Posted on 29/05/201730/05/2017 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved On : February 24, 2015 Judgment Delivered On : March 03, 2015 FAO (OS) 355/2008 JAGDISH PRASAD …..Appellant Represented by: Mr.Rajesh Rai, Advocate versus STATE …..Respondent Represented by: Ms.Rama Arora, Advocate for Land…

Both Parents should share Children Expeses

Posted on 02/04/2017 by MyNation Leave a comment

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT Before :- Jyotirmay Bhattacharya, J. C.O. No. 2451 of 2003. D/d. 07.04.2005. Sri Subhendu Dutta – Petitioner Versus Smt. Rita Dutta – Respondent For the Petitioner :- Mr. S. S. Haque, Mr. Sk. Kamaluddin, Mr. Sk. Salauddin Mollah and Mr. Subhrajit Chakraborty,…

Other than A relative of the husband, may not be prosecuted under Section 304B IPC

Posted on 05/07/201405/07/2014 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1278 OF 2014 (@SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) No.1696 of 2006) STATE OF PUNJAB ….. APPELLANT VERSUS GURMIT SINGH …. RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T Chandramauli Kr. Prasad State of…

Acquittal in 498A and 306 IPC

Posted on 05/07/201405/07/2014 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1567 of 2007 Kantilal Martaji Pandor Appellant Versus State of Gujarat & Anr. .. Respondents J U D G M E N T A. K. PATNAIK, J. This is an appeal by way…

Bigamy or Concubine will not come under 498A IPC

Posted on 30/06/201430/06/2014 by MyNation Leave a comment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17039 of 2011 1. Asha Devi W/o Suresh Singh, Resident Of Muhalla, Katharibagh, P.S- Chapra(T) , Distt- Saran At Chapra. 2. Suresh Singh S/O Late Harinandan Singh, Resident Of Muhalla, Katharibagh, P.S- Chapra(T) , Distt-…

Video conferencing And Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Posted on 11/05/2009 by MyNation Leave a comment

Kolkata High Court Amitabh Bagchi vs Ena Bagchi on 16/2/2004 JUDGMENT : A. Lala, J. 1. This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order passed by the District Judge at Howrah on 8th September, 2003 in the Miscellaneous…

Enter your email Address

MyNation KnowledgeBase

Landmark Judgments and Articles on Law

Tag: 1872

Every death of a Women is not abetment

Signature on document to be attested to prove the Document

Both Parents should share Children Expeses

Other than A relative of the husband, may not be prosecuted under Section 304B IPC

Acquittal in 498A and 306 IPC

Bigamy or Concubine will not come under 498A IPC

Video conferencing And Indian Evidence Act, 1872

STUDY REPORTS

Recent Comments

SC and HC Judgments Online at MyNation

498A victim Autobiography

MyNation Blog

News

Home Remedies N tips

Free Legal Help, Just WhatsApp Away